aiqorxCompany research
Collect relevant public filings.
Backend & data / SEC EDGAR & XBRL
Company information with original sources.
EDGAR filings and XBRL company facts support source-linked research and structured financial context.
Talk through your project
Technology in focusSEC EDGAR & XBRLThe systems behind the screen
A connected engineering approach
- 01Experience
People, tasks, accessibility
- 02Application
Components, logic, integrations
- 03Foundation
Data, operations, maintenance
The architecture follows your product requirements.
01 / Where it fits
Built around
a real use case.
Financial context
Normalize reported values with units and periods.
Evidence trails
Connect summary claims back to original documents.
02 / Architecture
The decisions
behind the build.
A sound foundation
Respect SEC access requirements, preserve filing identifiers, and distinguish reporting periods, units, and amendments. Keep source timestamps visible.
The tradeoff to consider
Reported facts need context. A numeric match alone does not establish the correct period or financial interpretation.
03 / Delivery & care
Make it work.
Keep it dependable.
Quality in the details
Test authorization, schema changes, concurrency, timeouts, and recovery. Inspect operational logs and rehearse restoring data and rolling back a release.
Understand
Review the users, existing systems, constraints, and definition of success.
Shape
Document the architecture, interfaces, risks, and delivery scope.
Build & validate
Review working increments against real use cases and failure conditions.
Handover & evolve
Prepare operating guidance, ownership, and a practical maintenance plan.
Related work / Documented implementation
Advisor Brief
A working AI prototype that gives wealth management advisors live market context, SEC-grounded company intelligence, and a source trail for every material claim.
Explore the project04 / A few useful questions
Before you begin.
Is SEC EDGAR & XBRL the right choice for my project?
Reported facts need context. A numeric match alone does not establish the correct period or financial interpretation.
Can we improve an existing application?
Start with a code and architecture review. The useful outcome is a clear decision about what to keep, improve, or replace, with the dependencies and delivery risks made explicit.
How are scope and cost determined?
The estimate depends on the workflows, integrations, platform requirements, and quality expectations. A focused discovery phase can reduce uncertainty before committing to the full build.
What happens after launch?
Agree on source ownership, documentation, monitoring, support responsibilities, and a maintenance plan as part of the engagement.
Something in mind?
Let's buildwhat's next.
A new website. A better product. A bigger possibility.It starts with a conversation.