All technologies

Mobile applications / Xamarin migration

Protect the product. Modernize the foundation.

Xamarin reached the end of Microsoft support on May 1, 2024. Existing products need a deliberate maintenance and migration plan.

Talk through your project
A person using a smartphone
Technology in focusXamarin migrationBuilt for the way people move

A connected engineering approach

  1. 01
    Experience

    People, tasks, accessibility

  2. 02
    Application

    Components, logic, integrations

  3. 03
    Foundation

    Data, operations, maintenance

The architecture follows your product requirements.

01 / Where it fits

Built around
a real use case.

01

Application assessment

Inventory native bindings, dependencies, and store requirements.

02

MAUI migration

Move suitable Xamarin.Forms applications toward .NET MAUI.

03

Modernization planning

Compare migration with targeted native or shared-code rebuilding.

02 / Architecture

The decisions
behind the build.

A sound foundation

Stabilize the existing release, map compatibility gaps, and migrate a representative feature before committing to the full scope.

The tradeoff to consider

Unsupported tooling increases release risk. Migration effort depends on native integrations and third-party controls.

03 / Delivery & care

Make it work.
Keep it dependable.

Quality in the details

Exercise the application on both the intended devices and supported operating systems. Include permission denial, interrupted connectivity, background transitions, and distribution requirements.

01

Understand

Review the users, existing systems, constraints, and definition of success.

02

Shape

Document the architecture, interfaces, risks, and delivery scope.

03

Build & validate

Review working increments against real use cases and failure conditions.

04

Handover & evolve

Prepare operating guidance, ownership, and a practical maintenance plan.

04 / A few useful questions

Before you begin.

Is Xamarin migration the right choice for my project?

Unsupported tooling increases release risk. Migration effort depends on native integrations and third-party controls.

Can we improve an existing application?

Start with a code and architecture review. The useful outcome is a clear decision about what to keep, improve, or replace, with the dependencies and delivery risks made explicit.

How are scope and cost determined?

The estimate depends on the workflows, integrations, platform requirements, and quality expectations. A focused discovery phase can reduce uncertainty before committing to the full build.

What happens after launch?

Agree on source ownership, documentation, monitoring, support responsibilities, and a maintenance plan as part of the engagement.

Official technology documentation

Something in mind?

Let's build
what's next.
A new website. A better product. A bigger possibility.It starts with a conversation.